Mary, The Mother of God
Mary, The Mother of God
Mary,
according to the teaching of the Catholic Church, is the Masterpiece
of our salvation.
Original
Plan – Eternity in the Garden. Genesis 3:1-15 The fall
of mankind.
1
Timothy 3:15 – never forget this verse...”the Church
(Catholic Church) is the pillar and foundation of truth.”
Protestants do not believe this, but that doesn't make it any less
true.
Note:
This means the Catholic Church only has been given the authority to
govern in all spiritual matters. It is the Catholic Church that
defines truth. It is the Magisterium of the Church that has final
say when deciding differences of opinion. These truths are called
Dogmas of the faith.
Dogma
– A declared truth that the faithful are obliged to believe.
Why
is a Dogma given? Because a
controversy arose within the church & a definitive answer to the
controversy must be given. Clarification is given to an already
declared belief in the church. Giving a teaching the status of dogma
emphasizes the necessity of continuing the belief as already
previously taught.
Catholic
Titles given to Mary cause angst to Protestants
Many
Protestants disapprove of all titles the Catholic Church gives to
Mary: The Mother of God; Meadatrix; Mother of the Church; they
disbelieve in her immaculate conception, do not think she was assumed
into heaven & definitely do not agree she was a life-long virgin.
Who's
right is always a fair question, which is Why there
needs to be a governing authority for spiritual difference, as there
can be disagreement even within the Church:
Nestorian
Heresy – Nestorius, a bishop of Constantinople started teaching
that Mary could only be the Mother of Christ. Nestorius said She
could not be the Mother of God, as in his mind, that would put her
before God. The Council of Ephesus was called in 431 to discuss the
matter. It was determined, through a dogma of the church, that
Nestorius' teaching was heretical & officially declared Mary the
Mother of God.
Recalling
the incident in the Garden, according to the Catholic Church, Mary
enters the salvation picture - Luke 1:26-38. Never
forget who is the pillar and foundation of truth! Other
denominations can argue this scripture doesn't depict Mary being part
of the salvation plan. However, this is exactly why “the keys to
the kingdom” were given to Peter and the Church.
The
New Eve
Jesus
begins His ministry & Mary is identified as the new Eve. John
2:1-11 (Adam is presented with Eve in Genesis, the first wedding.
It is not a coincidence the start of Jesus' ministry is at a
wedding. The new Adam and the new Eve start the plan of salvation.)
A
lesson in Catholic v. Protestant teaching
Jesus
used the term Woman, when answering Mary. The word Woman carries
controversy in that Catholics say it refers to Mary as the new Eve,
referencing when Adam referred to Eve as, “Woman, bone of my bone
and flesh of my flesh.” Protestants will say the word is used,
“because the Lord knew Catholics, one day, would elevate Mary to
too high a position, and this use of the word woman is proof the
Catholic teaching is wrong.” (paraphrased quote from a popular TV
evangelist)
The
“Garden Plan” is in full swing
Mary
becomes the Mother of us all (The Mother of the Church) John
19:26-27. And, according to
the teaching of the Church, scripture tells of the Garden Plan coming
to completion in Revelation 11:19 - 12:1-6
Dogmas
of the Catholic Church regarding Mary:
1.
Mother of God - Mary is declared “The Mother of God” at
the Council of Ephesus in 431A.D., as previously mentioned. How can
God have a mother, Protestants will say!? Calling her the Mother of
God elevates her too much is a common complaint of all Protestants.
She was a good woman, no doubt, but Catholics are wrong in the lofty
position they give her. Protestants will say Mary was the Mother of
Christ's human nature but not the Mother of His divine nature.
2.
Perpetual Virgin - Mary is declared “Perpetual Virgin” as
early as the 3rd Century. This is further defined by the
Lateran Council in 649. In scripture it is mentioned that Mary had
other “family members.” However, the Church maintains Jesus is
the only child of Mary, thus stating the so-called “brothers &
sisters of Jesus” mentioned in scripture (Mt. 13:55-56) were close
relations. Virtually all early church Fathers say the same thing,
Mary was always a virgin. When Catholics call Mary a virgin, they
mean she was and remained a virgin her entire life. When Protestants
refer to her as a virgin, they insist she was a virgin only until the
birth of Jesus & she then went on to have other children. In
scripture, the words brethren, brother or sister can be defined as
cousins & relatives.
3.
The Immaculate Conception - The third dogma regarding Mary is
her Immaculate Conception. This dogma was declared December 8, 1854
by Pope Pius IX. A fair question by all would be, “Why was this
teaching defined so late...something this important should have been
defined right away, perhaps in the first or second century?”
Remember how and why a dogma is developed. More
specifically, the dogma of the Immaculate Conception states "that
the most Blessed Virgin Mary, from the first moment of her
conception, by a singular grace and privilege from Almighty God and
in view of the merits of Jesus Christ, was kept free of every stain
of original sin."
Many
think the term immaculate conception means she conceived without a
natural father. The proper name for this would be virgin birth.
Others think immaculate conception means she was conceived “by the
power of the Holy Spirit”, like Jesus was. These thoughts would be
wrong. Immaculate conception means that Mary was conceived in the
womb of her Mother without the stain of original sin. In effect, she
was conceived in a state of sanctifying grace. Mary was preserved
from the state of sin from the first moment of her mother's
conception.
The
Catholic Church teaching summarizes: “by a special intervention of
God, undertaken at the instant she was conceived, she was preserved
from the stain of original sin and its consequences. She was
therefore redeemed by the grace of Christ, but in a special way.”
The angel Gabriel confirms this with the words, “hail Mary FULL of
grace.”
It
is certainly fair to question the teaching of the Church, as we being
human know how easy it is to sin. Consequently, the argument of her
being kept from sin is worthy of discussion. However, look at it
like this. A child who has not yet reached the age of reason is not
held culpable for sin until he understands. Is it really that far a
stretch to believe God could keep his chosen Mother from the stain of
sin, especially considering the angel of the Lord approached her
with, “hail Mary FULL OF GRACE.”
4.
Mary is assumed
into heaven - The
fourth dogma regarding Mary is her Assumption. This was made a dogma
on November 1, 1950. A
distinction needs to be made between Ascension and Assumption. Jesus
Christ, Son of God and Risen Lord, ascended into heaven, a sign of
His divine power. Mary, however, was elevated or assumed into heaven
by the power and grace of God.
The
dogma states that "Mary, Immaculate Mother of God, ever Virgin,
after finishing the course of her life on earth, was taken up in body
and soul to heavenly glory."
Protestants
believe the Catholic position of Mary's Assumption is that Catholic's
believe Mary did not die. That is a wrong assumption. The Catholic
position is that Mary did die. Amazingly, this was not made an
official dogma until 1950, when Pope Pius XII, in an exercise of
Papal infallibility, defined that Mary, “after the completion of
her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into the glory of
heaven.” In short, her body was not allowed to corrupt, as it did
not remain in the tomb.
Some
think Catholic teaching is that Mary ascended into heaven. This,
also, is not true. Jesus, of His own power ascended into heaven.
Mary was assumed, or taken up, by God into heaven. She did not, of
her own power, ascend into heaven.
Protestants
think this is crazy, as they believe Catholics have taken this too
far. Fair enough, as there is never a problem questioning a
teaching. The real question then becomes, “are you continuing to
seek the fullness of truth”, as there is biblical evidence that
proves it is possible. For example, Enoch and Elijah were both taken
up to heaven, without either of them dying. When Jesus died on Good
Friday, scripture states, “the graves were open and many bodies
arose out of them, bodies of holy men who had gone to their rest, who
after rising again, left their graves and went into the holy city
where they were seen by many.” Mt. 27:52-53
5.
Mary
as Mediatrix: By
calling Mary Mediatrix, Protestants think Catholics put Mary on par
with her Son. They say by calling her Mediatrix of all graces, this
denies Christ's position as the single mediator. However, if looked
on within reason, we have no problem asking someone or many someones
to pray for a particular need we have at any given time.
Non-Catholic believers do this all the time themselves. Mediating
for someone is as common as it gets. Mary is doing just that. Mary
gave the world a redeemer, the source of all graces. Therefore, in
this sense, she is the channel of all graces. Mary is the mediatrix
of all graces because of her intercession for us FROM HEAVEN!
6.
The
Veneration of Mary: According
to Protestants, veneration of Mary is nothing more than idolatry,
otherwise known as Mariolatry. The rosary is used as an example,
when they cite 10 prayers to Mary & only one to God The Father.
In layman's terms, “the Catholics prefer Mary 10 to 1 over God.
Bill Jackson, a Protestant writer, in his book Christian's
Guide to Roman Catholicism, in
an attempt to “explain” a problem of Catholicism, says it like
this, “The rise in devotion to her (Mary) came, when a backslidden
church, having lost the reality of Christ, was presented with the
pagan concept of a female deity and she was deemed able to mediate
between them and a God who was too far away.”
What
a shame that Protestants try to explain all things Catholic without
doing an actual historical investigation. Rather, in most cases,
they hear something they consider to be truthful because it came from
a trusted source, thus making that particular statement as good as
“holy writ.”
Mary's
role in salvation – defining the Garden encounter with Satan
The
role of Mary in Christ's work of salvation takes us back to Adam &
Eve, in the garden. In a most important passage of scripture, called
the Protoevangelium (the first gospel), God announces the coming of
the Messiah, the battle that will take place between the Woman and
the serpent, and his eventual defeat at the hands of her Son: “The
lord God said to the serpent, I will put enmity between you and the
woman, and between your seed and her seed; he shall bruise your head
and you shall bruise his heel.” (Gen. 3:14-15) The Church has
always understood that Christ, the new Adam, born of a woman,
fulfilled this prophecy, as the seed of the woman.
The
New Adam defined
In
the New Testament, St. Paul is the first to reflect on the
relationship between the first Adam and the new Adam: “For as by a
man came death, by a man has come also the resurrection of the dead.
For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive (1
Cor. 15:21-22). The comparison continues: “The first man Adam
became a living being; the last Adam became a life-giving spirit.
The first man was from the earth, a man of dust. The second man is
from heaven.” (1 Cor. 15:45, 47). What Adam bound up through his
disobedience, the new Adam loosened through his obedience. “For as
by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by one man's
obedience many will be made righteous.” (Rom. 5:19)
Christ
the new Adam – Mary the new Eve
Through
reflecting upon these scriptures and others like them, the early
Church began to see, in Mary, the image of the “new Eve.”
Already in the second century, the parallel between Eve and Mary is
well understood. St. Irenaeus, a bishop and theologian from the
second century, explains: “Just as Eve, having become disobedient,
was made the cause of death for herself and for the whole human race,
so also Mary, being obedient, was made the cause of salvation for
herself and for the whole human race. Thus, the knot of Eve's
disobedience was loosed by the obedience of Mary. For what Eve had
bound in unbelief, Mary loosed through faith.”
In
the fourth century, the bishop of Milan, St. Ambrose, whose fiery
sermons brought St. Augustine into the Church, asserts that while Eve
is called mother of the human race, Mary is called “Mother of
salvation.” And to sum up, let us not forget the frequent claim of
St. Jerome: “Death through Eve, life through Mary.”
Mary
is considered The Ark of The New Covenant
God
loved his people and wanted to dwell among them. He chose to do so in
a very special way. He instructed Moses to build a tabernacle
surrounded by heavy curtains and within the tabernacle, Moses was to
place a golden Ark. The Ark was made of acacia wood covered with
gold. Within the Ark was placed a golden jar holding the manna,
Aaron’s rod which budded, and the stone tablets of the covenant
(Heb 9:14). The Ark was covered with the mercy seat and with two
golden images of the magnificent cherubim who dwell in heaven (Ex
25:10-22).
When
Moses had finished making the Ark and the tabernacle, the glory cloud
of the Lord (the Shekinah Glory) covered the tent of meeting, and the
glory of the Lord filled the tabernacle (Ex 40:34-35; Num 9:18, 22).
The verb “to cover” or “overshadow” and the metaphor “cloud”
are used in a special way in the Bible. They represent the presence
and glory of God. The spirit of God covered or “overshadowed” the
Ark and the tabernacle and the glory of the Lord filled the
tabernacle.
The
Greek word for “overshadow” (episkiazein)
in Exodus 40 is rarely used in the Greek Old Testament. The Holy
Spirit chooses his words carefully. Here it is used when the presence
of God is overshadowing the Ark.
The
Holy Spirit Overshadows Mary
The
very same Greek word for “overshadow” is used by Gabriel when he
tells Mary that the Holy Spirit will overshadow her and she will
become pregnant. I don’t think the Holy Spirit chose to use the
rarely used Greek word, episkiazein,
in
both places without purpose.
If
someone reads Luke’s gospel without thinking like a Jew or having a
deep understanding of the Old Testament and its types and symbols,
this interesting bit of information about the Ark and Mary would
probably be missed. Luke is suggesting there is a parallel between
the Old Testament Ark, as the dwelling place of God, and Mary, as the
new dwelling of God. The difference, of course, is this time God
came to dwell upon the earth, in the flesh, rather than a cloud or
pillar of fire.
People
often ask why God was so specific and careful about every exact
detail of the Ark (Ex 25 — 30). God wanted it made for himself, as
a place for him to dwell (Ex 25:8). God made it very clear that the
word of God inscribed on stone should be housed in a perfect
container, covered with pure gold, within and without. How much more
would
God prepare a very special woman to carry his holy and only begotten
Son. Soon the Word of God, in flesh, would take up residence in the
womb of a young girl. Imagine how concerned God would be in preparing
a perfect and flawless Ark that would carry the Word of God
enfleshed, the Second Person of the Trinity.
More
hints there is nothing in the world like the Catholic Church - King
David and the Ark
However,
that is not all, as there are more fascinating hints that Luke gives
us. Again, they are carefully woven into the story of Mary and
likely overlooked, unless one was very familiar with the Old
Testament. Under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, Luke was an
author with real genius.
Please
pay attention
After
Moses died, Joshua led the people into the Promised Land. Joshua
established the Ark in Shiloh where it stayed for over two hundred
years. Then one day the Israelites were fighting the Philistines and
not doing so well. Consequently, they removed the Ark from the
temple and carried it to the front lines of the battle. God was not
pleased and the Philistines stole the Ark. After it caused lots of
problems, too many for them to explain, they sent the Ark back to
Israel (1 Sam 5:1- 6:12).
The
Ark arrived in the hill country of Judea. David arose and went to
retrieve the Ark (1 Sam 6:1-2). After Uzzah was struck dead, when he
touched the Holy Ark, David was afraid of the Ark and said “How can
the Ark of the LORD come to me?” (2 Sam 6:9). He left the Ark in
the hill country of Judea for three months (2 Sam 6:11). Then we are
told David, dressed as a priest, danced and leapt in front of the Ark
with all Israel shouting for joy (2 Sam 6:14). The house of
Obed-edom, which had housed the Ark, was blessed (2 Sam 6:11) and
then David took the Ark to Jerusalem (2 Sam 6:12).
Mary
Visits Her Relative Elizabeth - Luke
1:39-45
Now at this time Mary arose and went in a hurry to the hill country, to a city of Judah, and entered the house of Zacharias and greeted Elizabeth. When Elizabeth heard Mary’s greeting, the baby leaped in her womb; and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit. Elizabeth cried out with a loud voice and said, “Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb! “And how has it happened to me that the mother of my Lord would come to me? “For behold, when the sound of your greeting reached my ears, the baby leaped in my womb for joy. “And blessed is she who believed that there would be a fulfillment of what had been spoken to her by the Lord.”
Now at this time Mary arose and went in a hurry to the hill country, to a city of Judah, and entered the house of Zacharias and greeted Elizabeth. When Elizabeth heard Mary’s greeting, the baby leaped in her womb; and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit. Elizabeth cried out with a loud voice and said, “Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb! “And how has it happened to me that the mother of my Lord would come to me? “For behold, when the sound of your greeting reached my ears, the baby leaped in my womb for joy. “And blessed is she who believed that there would be a fulfillment of what had been spoken to her by the Lord.”
Just
a coincidence?
This
is a fascinating paragraph, filled with Old Testament allusions.
First, Mary arose and went to the hill country of Judea. The two
places, the place where the Old Testament Ark was taken, & where
Mary went to visit Elizabeth, are a stone’s throw away. Mary and
the Ark were both on a journey to the same hill country of Judea.
Second,
when David saw the Ark he rejoiced and said, “Who am I that the Ark
of the Lord should come to me?” and what does Elizabeth say? She
shouts out almost the same words, “Who am I that the Mother of my
Lord should come to me?” Is this by chance? Nothing is by chance in
Scripture and Luke is telling us something, drawing our mind back to
the Old Testament, showing us a parallel.
Third,
when David approached the Ark, he shouted out and danced and leapt in
front of the Ark. He even wore an ephod which was the clothing of a
priest. When Mary, the Ark of the New Covenant approaches Elizabeth,
John the Baptist leapt in his mothers womb. And John was from the
priestly line of Aaron. Both leapt and danced in the presence of the
Ark. David was filled with the Spirit to dance and rejoice.
Elizabeth, too, was filled with the Holy Spirit.
Fourth,
the Ark of the Old Covenant remained in the house of Obed-edom for
three months and we are told that Mary remained in the house of
Elizabeth for three months. Chance? Too many parallels to be a
mistake or chance.
Fifth,
the place that housed the Ark for three months was blessed and in
this short paragraph, Elizabeth uses the word “blessed” three
times and, certainly, their home was blessed by the presence of the
Ark (Mary) and the Lord within.
Sixth,
when the Old Testament Ark arrived, and when Mary arrived, they were
both greeted with “shouts of joy.” And the word for the cry of
Elizabeth’s greeting is another rare Greek word. It’s used in
connection with Old Testament liturgical ceremonies that were
centered around the Ark and worship. Luke again uses an uncommon
word borrowed from the Old Testament. A word any good Jew would
understand. Luke uses a word that would flip a light on in any Jewish
head.
Seventh,
the Ark returns to its home and ends up in Jerusalem where God’s
presence and glory is revealed in the Temple (2 Sam 6:12; 1 Ki
8:9-11) and Mary returns home and eventually ends up in Jerusalem
where she presents Jesus in the Temple (Lk 1:56; 2:21-22).
Only
the Catholic Church calls Mary “blessed”
Interestingly,
at this moment, Mary bursts into inspired, poetic worship and says
that all generations will call her blessed. Many Christians hesitate
to do this, but Catholics have called her blessed through the
centuries. Also it is interesting to notice that Mary’s prayer, the
Magnificat
(Lk
1:46-55), is based upon the prayer of Hannah (1 Sam 2:1-10). The late
Pope John Paul II said Hannah’s prayer was the biblical model for
Mary’s song and was the Magnificat
of the Old Testament. It
seems Mary was very well-versed in the Jewish Scripture, as she knew
that all generations will call her blessed.
Mary
in salvation history
Knowing
the depth of Scripture, the Jewish nature of the Bible, and the use
of biblical typology, it seems pretty clear that Luke has twice now
revealed something of the person and place of Mary in the history of
salvation – and he did it in a very clever manner. In the Ark of
the Old Covenant, God came to his people with a spiritual presence,
but in Mary, the Ark of the New Covenant, God comes to dwell with his
people not only spiritually, but physically
in
the womb of a specially chosen and prepared Jewish girl.
Mary
the Ark as Revealed in Mary’s Visit to Elizabeth
|
|
Golden
Box: Ark of the Old Covenant
|
Mary:
Ark of the New Covenant
|
Traveled
to House of Obed-Edom in the hill country of Judea (2 Sam 6:1-11)
|
Traveled
to house of Elizabeth and Zechariah in the hill country of Judea
(Lk 1:39)
|
Dressed
as a priest, David danced and leapt in front of the Ark (2 Sam
6:14)
|
John
the Baptist of priestly lineage leapt in his mother’s womb at
the approach of Mary (Lk 1:41)
|
David
asks “Who am I that the Ark of my Lord should come to me?” (2
Sam 6:9)
|
Elizabeth
asks “Who am I that the mother of my Lord should come to me?”
(Lk 1:43)
|
David
was shouting in the presence of the Ark (2 Sam 6:15)
|
Elizabeth
“cried out” in the presence of the Mary (Lk 1:42)
|
The
Ark remained in the house of Obed-edom for three months (2 Sam
6:11)
|
Mary
remained in the house of Elizabeth for three months (Lk 1:56)
|
The
house of Obed-edom was blessed by the presence of the Ark (2 Sam
6:11)
|
The
word “blessed” used three times and surely the house was
blessed by God (Lk 1:39-45)
|
The
Ark returns to its home and ends up in Jerusalem where God’s
presence and glory is revealed in the Temple (2 Sam 6:12; 1 Ki
8:9-11)
|
Mary
returns home and eventually ends up in Jerusalem where she
presents God enfleshed in the Temple (Lk 1:56; 2:21-22)
|
What
Things Were Placed in the Old Testament Ark?
The
Old Testament tells us that one item was placed inside the Ark while
in the Sinai Wilderness, as a witness to the people of Israel. God
had given Moses the Ten Commandments, written on stone, with his own
finger. God told Moses to place the tablets inside the Ark (Deut.
10:3-5) so that they would always be at the heart of their worship.
Hebrews
9:4
tells us that two additional
things
were placed in the Ark: “the Ark of the covenant, covered on all
sides with gold, in which was a golden jar holding the manna, and
Aaron’s rod which budded, and the tables of the covenant.” Each
of the three items had profound significance and were always to be
with the people in the very presence of God in the Ark.
There’s
even more. Inside the Ark is the law of God inscribed on stone, and
in the Book of Hebrews we read there’s also an urn of manna from
the wilderness and the rod of Aaron, which budded. What an amazing
parallel! Here we have the law of God inscribed on stone, but in the
womb of Mary, we have the word of God in flesh, a person.
We
also have the urn of manna, which was the manna that came down from
heaven, that if we ate of it we would still die. However, in Mary’s
womb is the Bread of Life come down from heaven, that if we eat of it
we will never die.
Again,
we have the rod of Aaron, which is proof of the true priesthood, but
in Mary’s womb, the Ark of the New Covenant, is the true priest,
from the order of Melchizedek. What an amazing parallel between these
two.
Mary
as the Ark Revealed by the Items inside the Ark
|
|
Inside
Ark of the Old Covenant
|
Inside
Mary, Ark of the New Covenant
|
The
stone tablets of the Law—the word of God inscribed on stone
|
The
body of Jesus Christ—the word of God in the flesh.
|
The
urn filled with manna from the wilderness—the miraculous bread
come down from heaven.
|
The
womb containing Jesus, the bread of life come down from heaven (Jn
6:41)
|
The
rod of Aaron which budded to prove and defend the true High Priest
|
The
actual and eternal High Priest
|
The
Temple and Ark now in Heaven
The
book of Revelation was pretty much rejected by the early Christians.
Many did not believe it belonged in the Bible. It was not accepted
universally until the end of the 4th century. However, after it was
finally declared as part of the canon, by the bishops of the Catholic
Church, Christians realized there was more revelation about Mary, as
the Ark.
The
Apostle John was exiled to the Island of Patmos. In Revelation 11:19,
John says something that would have shocked any 1st century Jew. The
Ark of the Old Covenant had been lost for centuries, as no one had
seen it for about 600 years.
Then,
in Revelation 11:19, John makes a surprise announcement: “And the
temple of God, which is in heaven, was opened; and the Ark of His
covenant appeared in His temple.” At this point, chapter 11 ends
and chapter 12 begins, but the Bible was not written with chapter and
verse divisions. Chapter & verse were added in the twelfth
century. When John penned these words, there was no division between
chapters 11 and 12. Therefore, in the context of saying he saw the
Ark of the Covenant in heaven, what is the next thing John says? “A
great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, and the
moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars; and she
was with child.” (Rev 12:1-2a). Who was the woman? Mary, the Ark of
the Covenant was revealed by God and John saw it in heaven. She was
seen bearing the child who would rule the world with a rod of iron
(Rev 12:5). Mary was seen as the Ark and as a queen.
Some
say the woman represents Israel or the Church, and certainly she
does. John’s use of rich symbolism is well known, but it is obvious
from the Bible itself that the woman is Mary. The Bible begins with a
real man (Adam), a real woman (Eve) and a real serpent (the devil).
Revelation, the last book of the Bible, also ends with a real man
(Jesus, the Last Adam, 1 Cor. 15:45), a real woman (Mary, the New
Eve, Rev 11:19-12:2) and a real serpent (the devil). This was
foretold in Genesis 3:15.
Later
in the same chapter, it says the devil went out to persecute the
woman’s other offspring, we Christians, which certainly seems to
indicate Mary is the mother of the Church (Rev 12:17). Here again we
see very good scriptural evidence of Mary being revealed by God in
Scripture as the Ark of the New Covenant. Even if someone disagrees
with Catholic teaching, they cannot argue that there is good and
reasonable scriptural foundations for this teaching. And it is a
teaching that has been taught by Christians from ancient times.
Comments
Post a Comment